🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law stated he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, however, may align so closely with the carefully constructed image promoted by official channels that, domestically, it functions as a compliment rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Superhero

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and its pop-culture machine have collaborated to forge a tailor-made persona of Putin. This character is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a television show launched last fall, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “save” Russia from disorder. While the character's name a different name, the message is clear: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this identical story instead of undercutting it. An adaptation inspired by a popular book aims to subvert the leader's mythology by presenting him not as a cause but as a consequence, moving the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, the president is presented as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to become president. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. Historically, these events ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody ever begged Putin to take the job. The presidency was in essence a casting call with many contenders. Central to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the country de facto.

• The shortlist included several politicians, including an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who researched his rise, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the events stated the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not engaged in field operations.

Curiously, the shift to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by the actor's arrival as 007. The grittier interpretation led Russian media and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters replacing the actor's likeness with his appeared on city centers, feeding the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is frequently an omnipotent figure who remains unseen on screen. He is hinted at through photographs or calls “from above”. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently validate the very myths it perhaps aims to question.